<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
  <title>Domain Data Notes | Kelytix</title>
  <link>https://www.kelytix.com/en/column/</link>
  <description>Notes on the data layer of AI in vertical domains: concrete scenario difficulties, engineering methods and trend judgement.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 09:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate>
  <atom:link href="https://www.kelytix.com/en/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
  <item>
    <title>Why Annotation Accuracy Is Misleading: The PEN Dataset Framework</title>
    <link>https://www.kelytix.com/en/column/pen-dataset.html</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.kelytix.com/en/column/pen-dataset.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 09:00:00 +0800</pubDate>
    <description>Annotation accuracy measures the samples that were labelled, not model behaviour. Drawing on public research, this article explains why a dataset of positives alone cannot define a model's boundary, why annotator disagreement is signal rather than noise, why evaluation sets saturate with age, and what each of the three PEN data categories — Positive, Edge, Negative — solves.</description>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>
